Insights
Why Building Software Is Like Building a House
3 min read.
Camilo Nova
CEOMost adults understand what it takes to build a house. You need a plan, a solid foundation, quality materials, and professionals who know what they're doing. You may not be aware that building software follows the same principles. Behind every great digital product is an invisible structure that holds everything together, designed by someone who understands how all the pieces work together.
Skipping this step is where most failure stories begin.
Start with the Foundation
Before pouring concrete or writing a single line of code, you need a blueprint. A house without a plan is a disaster waiting to happen. It's a piece of software built on improvisation. In both cases, it's the architect who gives shape to the vision, aligns the structure with practical needs, and makes sure that what is built won't fall apart under pressure.
In software, the architect is not optional. They make it scalable, secure, maintainable, and efficient. Just like a house needs good plumbing and electrical planning before the walls go up, software needs thoughtful architecture before a single interface is designed.
My Friend Can Do It Cheaper
Everyone knows someone who tried to save money on a renovation by hiring a cousin, a friend, or someone who "kinda knows how to do it." The results are almost always the same: good videos that people enjoy laughing at on social media.
The same happens in software. Businesses often hire inexperienced developers or attempt to build their own products without proper guidance and oversight. The project quickly turns into a patchwork of disconnected ideas and short-term fixes.
There's even historical evidence. Look at the Winchester Mystery House in California. After the death of her husband, Sarah Winchester hired no architect and continued building rooms and halls without a plan, resulting in staircases that led to nowhere, doors that opened into walls, and a house that made no functional sense. The same thing happens with software products that are filled with features that don't make sense.
On a more modern note, remember Healthcare.gov in 2013. A multi-million-dollar federal project was launched without a clear software architecture or integration strategy. It crashed on day one and needed an emergency task force to rebuild key components.
The Architect's Invisible Impact
A good house feels just right. The rooms flow logically, the temperature stays comfortable, and the light reaches where it needs to. You don't think about the architect when things work. You just know. Software is the same. Users don't thank the system architect when the app loads quickly or the database scales without crashing, but their decisions made those outcomes possible.
Preventing future disasters is often more valuable than fixing current ones. Architects think about long-term behavior, not just short-term deliverables. That's what separates professionals from amateurs.
There's a Leak
Here's a familiar story: there's a leak in the house, and suddenly every man in the room becomes an expert plumber. A YouTube video, a quick trip to Home Depot, and a couple of hours later, you've made it worse.
Time to call an actual plumber.
The same thing happens in software. An idea appears, and everyone thinks they know how to do it. "Just move the button," or "Can't you just add another field?"—without understanding the architecture, data model, or what might break as a result.
This overconfidence leads to rushed patches, band-aid solutions, and cascading issues that create technical debt. A minor issue evolved into a significant one because the underlying problem wasn't understood.
Their soul slowly vanishes from the original design. You end up with Frankenstein.
The Real Cost of Cutting Corners
Whether it's a home or software, fixing foundational problems after the fact is expensive. You don't just replace the pipe—you tear down the wall. You don't just add another field to a form—you risk breaking everything else connected to it.
In software development, it's often better to start from scratch and rebuild. Trying to patch all the holes ends up being more expensive.
Doing it right from the start, working with experts, is always the more cost-effective and brilliant move.
Build with Experts
You wouldn't build your home without an architect. You wouldn't let your cousin handle your plumbing or wire your walls just because he's watched a podcast. So, why treat the software that runs your business any differently?
If you want it to last, to scale, and to stay dry when it rains, bring in the experts from the start. Accept that you don't know it all, and let an expert guide you. That's the best decision you can make.
Written by Camilo Nova

Software Engineer, Investor, CEO, and father of two. Camilo writes on the intersection of technology, design, and business.